Hitler and Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man
A joke about comparison and contrast between Hitler and artists.
As far as we know, Hitler himself was an artist. Typically, artists convey their inner thoughts and emotions to create an artwork. Such spiritual and inner emotions are, hence, drawn from oneself. A painting gazer would look upon a huge painting block, and try to interpret the immense human acts, landscape, or the like.
Hitler was a painter. I’d never seen his works, nor would I want to. I cannot imagine such painting. He was a frustrated artist. I’m quite sure that he painted several failed works. His steamy head is completely a failure as painter. He couldn’t translate the inner emotions to paintings, probably because of Nietzsche the philosopher, who darkened his heart to raw darkness. He saw the German world as a literal message and straightforward, so much that he is literally mortified at nights seasonally.
Artists are captivating at best. Our thoughts are stunned upon the sight of works. Such wonder is immeasurable at best and self explanatory. Yet Hitler is uncapable of such work. Taught by anger of failures, he was determined to change the world himself. Such failures taught him to become a great actor. Being a screwed up artist, he is angered and ready to throw the thunderbolt as the stage of self-acting politican. Thus, Hitler’s years of miserable and failure as a painter has transitioned to an actor.
Liked it













2 Comments
I enjoy reading this piece, thanks!
Yes, sir. By the way, I’m a big fan of Taoist and Qing dynasty. Interesting Chinese history. I liked the Hero movie starred by Jet Li. Seems like Chinese history and American history are paralleling.