Follow us on Twitter

Against the Common Good

Published by Daniel Maxson in Offbeat
April 27, 2009

I’m going to give away my upper-middle class bias here, but I’m under the impression that when we’re choosing our career, it should be more a question of what we enjoy doing and less a question of what we think will be “for the greater good”.

Let’s face it, we’re greedy. We can’t really be happy unless things are going more or less our way (though we may change what “our way” is if that seems to be the only way to cope). So it seems to me like you can save a lot of burnout by just doing what you enjoy in the first place.

Actually, there was a House episode to this effect. A doctor on the verge of curing cancer became ill and decided that life was too short to be so serious about the serious things. So instead, she decided to do what she wanted to do- cooking classes. She never went back to her cure, because she figured, other people with the energy can pick up where she left off. She has a life to live.

I’ll be real honest, “the common good” is way down there on the list of reasons I decided to study journalism. I will probably contribute to the common good somewhere along the line (hopefully more often than not), but I don’t think that’s justification to devote my life to something.

Think about your mentors in life. What common aspect did they share? I’m going to go out on a limb and say they had at least some sense of fun and excitement about what they did. I know all mine have. We simply perform better and longer when we enjoy what we’re doing.

I notice this thread through a lot of my younger friends, though, that they want to have a positive impact in the world. That’s why they’re doing what they’re doing. And I just have to ask, why? What do you mean? You don’t have to be documenting injustices in Africa to have a positive impact.

We are a global community, I’m aware. But I often think how we seem to be more concerned about what other people are doing or suffering at the expense of pulling our own lives together. It’s a self-righteous escape from our own unrewarding lives, I believe.

Now note, if you really want to (or believe you should) go aid Africa or fight world hunger or whatever, by all means, go for it. But I think your motive will have a huge impact in how effective you will be. If you’re doing it out of a misguided sense of “If I don’t help, I am a part of the problem,” that will wear you down. If you do it because you genuinely love the people and love what you’re doing to help them (obviously it won’t be roses all the time, but speaking generally), that’s awesome, and the energy you put into it will build on itself.

1
Liked it

1 Comment

  1. ladybaby
    Posted April 27, 2009 at 10:27 am

    Everything you wrote, makes perfect sense. It is too bad that our society is so focused on beating out other countries in the technical fields, that they implant false ideas in the heads of our children. To be successful and to make a lot of money is all that is taught in our schools. If we were simply allowed to do what we love and enjoy doing, instead of looking good for our country by getting high test scores, or taking jobs that benefit the CEO’s etc.we would be a lot happier, and accomplish more humanitarian deeds. For the love of money is the root of all evil, and that verse in the Bible says a lot. When we make money or main goal in life, we miss out on the important aspects of life. Great article.

Leave a Reply

Search PurpleSlinky

heyzap.com - embed games